vortex

Vortex Of Self Indulgence

I was just reading a news article that came across my news-feed. Perhaps you have read it as well. Major shareholders of the wealthiest company in the world, Apple are claiming that children’s addiction to the apple products needs to be addressed. My first reaction is yes. I’m an adult and I feel a great loss when my smartphone is not available and I have lived long before the smart phone was ever considered. I certainly was never tempted to be permanently attached to my phone that had a cord attached to it in the hallway outside of the kitchen.
Philosophers and researchers contend that we long for experiences that energize us: dynamic football games, nail-biting movies, or stimulating novels. This excitement gives pangs to all; however, it is weighted by a feeling of boredom with our own lives. So may of us are addicted to drama that is never quite satisfying. This in turn, causes us to hunger for more and more drama. This beast is insatiable. Moreland explains how the pursuit of happiness becomes the goal most people set for themselves. Is this what we want for ourselves and our students? Happiness? Happiness is the shallow and fleeting beast that must always be fed more in order to be satisfied. Could it be that contentment or passion are much more fulfilling? Because focusing on happiness as a life goal is not what God intended, people become empty selves and fall apart. Those caught in the vortex of pursuing happiness or thrill lose sight of a greater purpose. He describes this as a “thin world” – a world where there is no objective value, purpose, or meaning. It is a world that is just there. Alternatively, Moreland describes what a “thick world” is about. “A thick world is one in which there is such a thing as objective value, purpose, and meaning. In a thick world, some things really matter and other things don’t. Some things are right and others are wrong” (p. 29). It is this world, that Moreland charges Christians to claim. This is the same world that was understood as truth until the postmodern nonsense pushed out any reliable truth.
We can all agree that we live in a “sensate” culture, a culture that is only physical and realized by the five senses. In contrast, Moreland describes an alternative view of reality: an “ideational” culture – one that embraces the sensory world yet values an extra-empirical immaterial world. What he means is that we strive for the ideal design rather than some superficial self-gratifying construct. Because of the prevailing sensate culture, Moreland says, “the only knowledge we can have about reality is empirical knowledge gained by the hard sciences” (Kingdome Triangle, p. 22). Additionally, out of this belief comes a view that any non-empirical claims are items of knowledge relegated to matters of private feelings.
Modern Christian philosophers asserts that a “three-way worldview struggle rages in our culture:
  • ethical monotheism,
  • postmodernism, and
  • scientific naturalism” (Kingdom Triangle, p. 22).
I will unpack these in future blogs and hope to present ways that we can help our students overcome the struggles.

Head of School Blog

Share : Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on GooglePlusShare on PinterestShare on Linkedin
every-battle-starts-in-the-mind

Battle Hymn of the Mind

Dr. Moreland is one of my favorite modern Christian philosophers. Dr. J.P. Moreland, a leading evangelical thinker and distinguished professor of philosophy at Talbot School of Theology, has prompted discussion with a passionate, academic, deeply biblical and timely treatise on how to “recover the Christian mind, renovate the soul and restore the spirit’s power.” He says, “Christian teaching as a source of knowledge” in his book, Kingdom Triangle p.35). It is inspiring to read a book written by a Christian scholar who has illuminated the foundational issues of knowledge and the Church so profoundly. As a Christian educator the task of developing a Christian mind relating to spiritual formation in particular and Kingdom power at large is particularly poignant.

 

In his books Love Your God With All Your MInd and Kingdom Triangle, Dr. Moreland takes the reader on an intellectual adventure. He proposes thought provoking questions that encourage deeper reflection and insight. This book inspire those called to be teachers, scholars for the church, parents whose children are in school, and an unbelieving world. Thisis an enthusiastic vision for shedding light on the health and future of the Western church (Kindgowm Triangle, p.14). According to Steven Ivester’s review of Dr. Moreland’s books, “His books are deeply academic and do not shy away from in-depth analysis of various philosophical terms, appropriate biblical scholarship, and credible authorities on social science, theological, and cultural issues, it never treads wearily through the tedious; it’s equally practical. The writing is crisp, clear, and compelling from beginning to end.”

 

Often I refer to Dr. Moreland and others in the Worldview class that I teach twice a week. I think It is important that our students are able to assess the “crisis of our age”. I am passionate about ensuring that our students understand the current state of Western culture and the lies they are being told as if it is bonafide truth. If research is correct, we are losing the cultural war. We need to “band together” as Christian’s today have lost intellectual ground. As Moreland says, “Both in and out of the Church, Jesus has been lost as an intellectual authority” (77). In short, Christians must learn to think. Salem Christian school is poised to stand in the cultural cross hairs with the Truth needed to combat this onslaught from the enemy.

 

Over the next few weeks I intend to delve a little deeper into this worldview battle. I want to draw the battle lines. I want to help students, parents, and teachers, to understand what is at stake. I desire to see the Christian school standing at the gates

 


Head of School Blog

 

Share : Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on GooglePlusShare on PinterestShare on Linkedin
westernveastern

Eastern & Western Thought

This past summer, I had the opportunity to travel throughout China for two weeks promoting Salem Christian School and American  education system in general.   The trip was sponsored by a company that connects Chinese students interested in international studies with American private schools.  In 10 days, I traveled to 14 cities and 5 provinces in 7 flights, 4 trains, and a ferry with an additional countless hours in Chinese “Uber” service.  Within each of these cities we visited anywhere from two to four schools.In each location, I was expected to provide a presentation in each of these schools.  The presentation was to be 10-20 minutes.  Mind you, this would cut the time in half because it would need to include English to Chinese translation.  That is a short time to share the significance of experiencing the value of a Christian education at Salem Christian School.  Two days before departure, they requested I teach a lesson.  I wasn’t sure how I could  teach a proper lesson within these parameters regardless of having no idea on what would even be a profitable lesson to teach.  Initially, I  declined.

I stuck to a simple presentation; at least, until my second day when I was in Shanghai.  There I was relentlessly requested to teach a lesson.   I had an epiphany, likely the Holy Spirit prompting.  Why not share about the school through the construct of my worldview class I teach seniors?  It suddenly became clear on how I could teach a lesson and share the school in such a confined time and it still be valuable.

I began sharing  how Westerners think differently than those from Eastern cultures with a few anecdotal examples.   I contended that we derive our philosophical thoughts mainly from Greek philosophers.  An example of this is ‘The Allegory of The Cave‘ by Plato.

I shared the Allegory of the Cave by Plato.  In this allegory, three men were captive and chained facing a wall.  For their entire lives they could only see shadows and hear the distorted sounds of people walking by on a ledge far away and behind them.  One day, a man escaped the cave to see the world as it really was.  He returned to the ledge to talk to the two men left chained; but, all they could see was his shadow from the fire and his distorted voice.

The ‘Allegory Of The Cave‘ is a theory put forward by Plato, concerning human perception. Plato claimed that knowledge gained through the senses is no more than opinion and that, in order to have real knowledge, we must gain it through philosophical reasoning.  Reality and knowledge takes deep thought and experience to uncover.

This allegory describes western thought of knowledge, learning, and philosophy for thousands of years.  Although westerners think differently and certainly behave differently, there are certain universal truths.

Not unlike the escapee, we try to teach those universal truths and help students understand the world as it really is.  Christianity is about understanding the universe as God would have us see it.  We cannot fully uncover reality or entirely understand it without God.  Thus, Salem Christian School endeavors to teach pupils to think in light of His Truth.  Knowing the Truth will most definitely require the student to think differently than their secular counterparts.

Salem Christian School understands that every human being, no matter the cultural background, needs to transform their minds in order to understand the fullness of the universe.  And, by that, we mean seeing it how God sees it.  Thus, every subject taught and every aspect of the school is permeated with the Christian worldview.  This school’s foundation mission is to develop a student who loves God with all his or her mind, body and soul.  And, a vision for how it is done is integral to living out the Christian worldview philosophy effectively. And that describes a student’s academic life, student life, and spiritual at Salem Christian School.


Head of School Blog

 

Share : Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on GooglePlusShare on PinterestShare on Linkedin
Block Schedule Image

Block Scheduling Done Right

Recently I was asked why we do block scheduling the way we do.  Much effort has gone into the study systems that will help SCS meet its goals of academic excellence and its extensive impact on student learning. As with any choice, there are both pros and cons. At Salem Christian School, we had to move towards a format which enables the school to provide more dynamic instruction, broader choices, and more nimble scheduling that this change enables. Some of the major advantages researchers have noted are the following:

Improved Teaching and Learning

With longer blocks, teachers have more time to complete lesson plans. More class time is available to develop key concepts, incorporate creativity into instruction, and try a variety of classroom activities that address different learning styles. Longer time blocks allow for deeper instruction instead of wider coverage.(O’Neil, 1995; Eineder & Bishop, 1997).

Ability to Focus Attention

Using active learning methods helps the students better understand and retain material.(Rettig & Canady, 1996). With block scheduling, students have fewer subjects during a semester, enabling the learners to explore deeper and allow the teachers to focus efforts.

Fragmentation Reduced

With block scheduling, instructional time is not fragmented by frequent transitions between classes. Fewer distinct classes means less time spent on classroom management activities, such as calling attendance and organizing and focusing the class. In addition, there are fewer opportunities for students to arrive late to class (Rettig & Canady, 1996).

Individualized Pace

The schedule allows advanced students to move through material at a more rapid rate, and they are able to finish sequential language classes within one academic year. (Woronowicz, 1996).

More Course Offerings

Students actually take more courses in a standard plan because they enroll in at least eight classes per year instead of six or seven (Rettig & Canady, 1996).

Stronger Inter-Personal Relationship

A hallmark of SCS is the family atmosphere. Anything to promote this is always welcome. The number of daily classes for which students and teachers must adjust and prepare is decreased, allowing students to develop the deeper interpersonal relationships that are integral to academic success (Rettig & Canady, 1996; Eineder & Bishop, 1997). Teachers get to know students more personally which enables them to adapt lessons to the interests of their students.

Attitudes and Comprehension Improve

Research indicates that teachers’ and students’ attitudes about their school improve. Both teachers and students state that they get more done in class and learn more because they are better able to focus their attention. Classes address material in more depth, and teachers feel students are better able to comprehend and retain concepts learned in a block period (O’Neil, 1995; Eineder & Bishop, 1997).

Source: http://www.ashland.k12.or.us/files/advantages%20of%20block%20scheduling.pdf

College Preparatory

Almost all of our students move onto a four-year college degree at some point.  The transition from eight 40-minute classes to four 83-minute classes is difficult.  The skill to handle this is learned in an environment that is more personally supportive and has more accountability for the student in high school than in college.  Thus, this model prepares the students for the expectations that they will face.  The second preparatory element of block scheduling is the use of college credit and dual enrollment at SCS instead of Advanced Placement courses.  This better aligns the schedule to accommodate these courses.

These were the reasons that we moved to this model and continue to stay within this model.  Of course, there are always areas to improve.  We could better use the model.  But, it has significantly made a difference in the academic prowess of our school.  In fact we have been used as a model for other schools in the northeast.

We had the same concern about gaps in the learning that seems like it would occur due to the space of time between courses.  There are two aspects to this that would need to  explore.  The first is whether the gaps do indeed pose a challenge.  The second is what does the school and students do to overcome the  challenges if they do indeed exist.

Theoretically, we are teaching towards mastery and automaticity.  This means, that the student has adopted the skills, concepts, or outcomes to a degree that he or she can confidently and automatically rely on them.   Of course there are skills and concepts that need multi-courses and years to develop.  But, these skills are scaled so that we can teach mastery of each step so that they can use them automatically as they move onto the next level of skills or concepts.  We see this most often in mathematics and reading.  We teach the same skills in reading instruction from grade one all the way through twelfth grade.  However, at every step the skills are expanded and become more complex.  The gap between the school years often allow us to catch the gaps that have occurred in students who haven’t truly mastered something and allows us to provide remediation and review.

We recognize that some courses are more vulnerable to this gap than others.  For example, we read in every class and incorporate writing in every class.  Thus, there is no specific gap in this, because we expand the vocabulary and writing skills each time we confront new material in other classes.   However, math is sequential in skills and may be more vulnerable to the skills.   Granted, geometry and algebra are very different maths.  Thus, the skills are different.  But, because we want to ensure mathematics ability is strong and continue to build on strong SAT scores, we require a math lab in the semester that students are not in a leveled math class.  At SCS, our students received significant more time in math each year than any other program because we have this system.  The math labs allow for remediation, enrichment, and SAT prep.  The teachers have developed this course (which is unique to SCS) in order to have outcomes that are tailored in order to ensure our students’ scores on college boards are strong.

All of this seems to be working well.  However, we want to measure it and have hard data that supports this.  Thus, we have instituted a few things.  We have entrance exams in every math course every semester.  It provides feedback to the students, parents, and teacher about retention and specific instructional needs for that semester’s students.  Additionally, we have instituted that every student in grade 8-10 takes the PSAT.  This will provide valuable data that we can track and use to measure the efficacy of our program.

Thank you very much for submitting your question.  I hope that I have answered it.  If it prompts more, then I can continue on this topic or move onto the next question when it comes.


Head of School Blog

 

Share : Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on GooglePlusShare on PinterestShare on Linkedin